My first experiences with Twine
Today finally I logged in to Twine the first time. I was reading yesterday about some shortcomings of the system, so I was keen on trying out the system by myself to get my own impression.
It´s true that the system isn´t as easy to understand as del.icio.us or other bookmarking tools. It takes a while until you get used to all those additional ways you can navigate through the system. Remember: “Twine looks at content and parses it automatically for the names of people, places, organizations and other subject tags. Users are then able to navigate between related content, view recommended content and connect with recommended people with related interests.” – But the “shortcoming” mentioned by Marshall Kirkpatrick that “… it’s hard to keep track of all the levels and types of information available” I can´t agree with: This has only to do with a general problem, which arises whenever semantic technologies should enhance the user experience. Either you stay with “simple” user-interfaces like Google or del.icio.us or you spend 5 minutes or so to learn a new piece of software which will help you to save time in the future and which helps you to find related information automatically.
On the other hand I was very surprised, that the automatic recommendations Twine makes on how to annotate or describe a new resource is really unsatisfying. Users will only spend time to tag their bookmarks if the machine comes up with some intelligent suggestions. And it´s true, as Marshall says, “most of the web is made up of ugly, non-standard pages.”
So hopefully Twine will add that feature before it will open up to the public (isn´t there a plan to integrate OpenCalais or something similar?), otherwise there will be no “first mainstream semantic web application” but only another prototype of a yet another semweb-app.
The “career” of a website can be strange sometimes…
When I first stumbled upon “StumbleUpon” about two years ago or so, I was fascinated by the idea of this application using “collaborative filtering” – the wisdom of the crowd. But after a while more and more friends were using del.icio.us, which wasn´t that brilliant at all to my opinion but simply more often used. Most of all I am missing a function which helps you to identify new interesting websites by simply clicking on one button. Moreover delicious doesn´t help to identify “Friends with same interests” like for example Facebook offers with music taste etc.
Now, a year after del.icio.us had its tremendous boom StumbleUpon seems to catch up.
Sometimes websites have strange “careers”: it´s a bit the word of mouth, a bit – of course – media which helps to boost websites, and finally with a little help from one of the big Web 2.0 companies (in this case Ebay´s US$75Mio.) you can do it!
Zimbra is the Collaboration Suite for the Social Semantic Web
We´ve been using Zimbra since a couple of months now, and I think it´s a fantastic opportunity for each small or medium enterprise, especially when virtual teamwork becomes more and more important (like in my working environment), to make a step towards Web 2.0. Besides typical features a collaboration suite usually offers, Zimbra comes with a couple of concepts which have the potential for a “Next Generation Collaboration” (collaborate or collapse):
- Zimbra comes with a powerful search engine based on Lucene
- Zimbra has an integrated tagging-system
- Zimbra´s spam filter learns from each user in the system, if an email is spam or not – a very good example for an application of collective intelligence
- Zimbra´s Zimlets support meshups and with that mechanism any message content can be made “live” by linking it with other services and content (eg. if in a textpassage the word “today” appears it will automatically be linked with your calendar entries from “today”)
And: Zimbra can be synchronised with your PDA…
Yahoo Researcher Declares Semantic Web Dead – and reborn again…
When Mor Naaman from Yahoo said in a special track on Web 3.0 at WWW2007 that the “Semantic Web” is dead, he obviously tried to attract attention. Nevertheless, in my opinion he is absolutely right – there is no chance to “teach” people to annotate web content in a more sophisticated way than “social tagging” (and I´m pretty sure that also in the future it will always be a small community which will tag their content).
But in one point Mor Naaman missed the point: The “Semantic Web” was always there, under-cover more or less. Living in a tin with a lousy HTML-lid. And inside the tin there has always been enough semantics. There is no need to re-invent the data models, the namespaces, the ontologies (at least for most of the basic “things”) as Naaman proposes in his talk (slide 13). How easily all the existing semantics can be released and mapped against the “Semantic Web” (and suddenly it was born again
) is demonstrated by projects like [1] or [2].
Reminder: Call for papers TRIPLE-I
TRIPLE-I
The Innovation Conference for Knowledge Management, New Media Technology and Semantic Technologies
5 – 7 September 2007
Graz, Austria
http://www.triple-i.info
The TRIPLE-I Conference series is a joint venture of the conferences
- I-KNOW – International Conference on Knowledge Management
- I-MEDIA – International Conference on New Media Technology
- I-SEMANTICS – International Conference on Semantic Technology
Regular paper submissions for I-KNOW may include but are not limited to:
- Identifying Relationships between different kinds of Knowledge Entities
- Service-oriented Architectures for Knowledge Management Systems
- Service-based Knowledge Management
- Orchestration of Knowledge Management Services
- Distributed Knowledge Management
- Social Network Analysis
- Knowledge Work Productivity
- Communication and Collaboration in Knowledge Management
- Context and Usage Pattern Identification and Management
- Agile Approaches to Knowledge Management
Regular paper submissions for I-MEDIA may include but are not limited
to:
- Web 2.0 Applications for Content Providers
- Business Models for New Media
- Social Media Platforms
- User-Generated Content
- Cross-Media Content Production and Delivery
- Cross-Media Search and Retrieval
- New Media Services
- Innovative User Interfaces for Media Devices
- The Geospatial Web
- Marketing of Products and Services via New Media
Regular paper submissions for I-SEMANTICS may include but are not limited to:
- Semantic Social Software
- Semantic Wikis and Weblogs
- Semantic Desktop
- Social Tagging and Folksonomies
- Ontology Engineering
- Terminology Management
- Visualisation of Semantic Models
- Interoperability, Integration and Reasoning
- Semantic Web Applications
- Experiences, Studies and Metrices
Deadlines
21 May 2007: Full paper submission (4-8 pages)
18 June 2007: Notification of acceptance
13 July 2007: Final version (8 pages)
5-7 September 2007: TRIPLE-I Conference
RDFa is on it´s way…
Maybe a year old now, but still a really useful Web-Service is provided by Elias Torres: His RDFa Extractor also shows how to insert HTML containing RDFa into a Sparql-Query.
RDFa, what is this? Have a look at this short summary, and it´s also worth discussing about the co-existence between RDFa and microformats.
Video on the semantic social web
No doubt that Stefan Decker and Tom Gruber are the most influental persons in the involving semantic social web. Both are working on a unified view on folksonomies & ontologies, practical as well as formalistic aspects of the web and develop things like the “social semantic desktop” or “tag ontologies”.
Tom Gruber´s presentation at ISWC 06 “Where the Social Web Meets the Semantic Web” can be watched at videolectures.net: In one of the main parts of his talk he will state the question: “How can we put all these tagclouds out there together?”
Definitively an important question…